Learn how OpenHands and SWE-agent differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ai coding agents is best for you.

OpenHands appears to have several advantages over SWE-agent, particularly in popularity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OpenHands significantly outpaces SWE-agent in community adoption with 83,327 stars compared to 20,016 stars on GitHub. This 4.2x difference suggests OpenHands has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, OpenHands has 10,753 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with OpenHands last updated 13 hours ago and SWE-agent 4 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: OpenHands uses Typescript, JSX.
Both projects started around the same time, with OpenHands beginning 2 years ago and SWE-agent 2 years ago.
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in AI Coding Agents. However, they also have distinct specializations: OpenHands also focuses on AI Coding Assistants.
OpenHands provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while SWE-agent may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.

vs
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository