Learn how OpenHands and SWE-agent differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ai coding agents is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

OpenHands appears to have several advantages over SWE-agent, particularly in popularity, growth and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OpenHands significantly outpaces SWE-agent in community adoption with 86,215 stars compared to 20,224 stars on GitHub. This 4.3x difference suggests OpenHands has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, OpenHands has 11,310 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
OpenHands is growing faster, adding 2,931 stars in the last 30 days (+3.5%) against adding 212 stars for SWE-agent (+1.1%). OpenHands is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with OpenHands last updated 2 days ago and SWE-agent 6 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: OpenHands uses Typescript, JSX.
Both projects started around the same time, with OpenHands beginning 2 years ago and SWE-agent 2 years ago.
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in AI Coding Agents.
OpenHands provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while SWE-agent may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.