Learn how Kilo and SWE-agent differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ai coding agents is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
14 hours agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v7.8.27License
MITRepository
kilo-org/kilocode
Last 30 days
Last commit
7 days agoRepository age
3 yearsVersion
v1.1.0License
MITRepository
swe-agent/swe-agent
Both Kilo and SWE-agent have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Kilo having 27,913 stars and SWE-agent having 20,764 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Kilo has 3,348 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Kilo and SWE-agent are moving at much the same rate, adding 363 stars and adding 248 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+1.3% vs +1.2%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Kilo last updated 14 hours ago and SWE-agent 7 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Kilo uses Typescript, JSX, Next.js, Golang, PHP.
Both projects started around the same time, with Kilo beginning 2 years ago and SWE-agent 3 years ago.
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in AI Coding Agents.