Kilo vs Roomote
Learn how Kilo and Roomote differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ai coding agents is best for you.
Learn how Kilo and Roomote differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ai coding agents is best for you.
Kilo
Last 30 days
Last commit
7 hours agoRepository age
1 yearVersion
v7.0.16License
MITRepository
kilo-org/kilocode
Roomote
Last 30 days
Last commit
6 hours agoRepository age
1 monthVersion
v0.40.0License
FCL-1.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
roocodeinc/roomote
Detailed Comparison
Kilo appears to have several advantages over Roomote, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Kilo appears to have several advantages over Roomote, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
Kilo significantly outpaces Roomote in community adoption with 26,930 stars compared to 195 stars on GitHub. This 138.1x difference suggests Kilo has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Kilo has 3,068 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Development Activity
Both projects show recent activity, with Kilo last updated 7 hours ago and Roomote 6 hours ago.
Technology Stack
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Kilo uses Python, Golang, PHP.
Project Maturity
Kilo has been in development longer, starting 1 year ago, compared to Roomote which began 1 month ago. This 1.3-year head start suggests Kilo may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
Kilo uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Roomote's FCL-1.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in AI Coding Agents. However, they also have distinct specializations: Kilo also focuses on IDEs & Code Editors.
Hosting & Deployment
Roomote provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Kilo may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
Capture – Capture screenshots, generate PDFs, scrape content, extract metadata, and automate browsers with one API.