Ad
 
Learn More

Kilo vs Qwen Code

Learn how Kilo and Qwen Code differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ai coding agents is best for you.

vs
Favicon of Kilo

Kilo

AI
Open source AI coding agent with 500+ models, bring-your-own-key support, and specialized modes for writing, debugging, and planning code across IDEs and CLI.
27,621stars+307(+1.1%)

Last 30 days

Screenshot of Kilo
Favicon of Qwen Code

Qwen Code

AI
Terminal-based AI coding agent that reads your codebase, edits files and runs commands, with support for Qwen, OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini and local models.
Screenshot of Qwen Code

Detailed Comparison

Kilo appears to have several advantages over Qwen Code, particularly in growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Comparable
Community & Popularity

Both Kilo and Qwen Code show comparable community engagement with 27,621 and 28,504 stars respectively. In terms of developer contributions, Kilo has 3,264 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Kilo wins
Growth Momentum

Kilo is growing faster, adding 307 stars in the last 30 days (+1.1%) against adding 0 stars for Qwen Code (0%). Kilo is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable
Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Kilo last updated 1 hour ago and Qwen Code 2 hours ago.

Comparable
Project Maturity

Both projects started around the same time, with Kilo beginning 2 years ago and Qwen Code 1 year ago.

Kilo wins
Licensing

Kilo uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Qwen Code's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable
Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in AI Coding Agents.