Learn how Codex CLI and Qwen Code differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ai coding agents is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
4 hours agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v0.166.0License
Apache-2.0Repository
openai/codex
Last 30 days
Last commit
4 hours agoRepository age
1 yearVersion
v0.26.7License
Apache-2.0Repository
qwenlm/qwen-code
Codex CLI appears to have several advantages over Qwen Code, particularly in popularity and growth. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Codex CLI significantly outpaces Qwen Code in community adoption with 133,262 stars compared to 29,016 stars on GitHub. This 4.6x difference suggests Codex CLI has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Codex CLI has 21,107 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Codex CLI is growing faster, adding 3,879 stars in the last 30 days (+3%) against adding 512 stars for Qwen Code (+1.8%). Codex CLI is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Codex CLI last updated 4 hours ago and Qwen Code 4 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, Python, Rust, C, Objective-C, C++. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Qwen Code leverages JSX, Next.js, Java, Swift, Kotlin, Tauri, MATLAB.
Both projects started around the same time, with Codex CLI beginning 2 years ago and Qwen Code 1 year ago.
Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in AI Coding Agents.