Learn how Cline and Qwen Code differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ai coding agents is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Stars
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Cline appears to have several advantages over Qwen Code, particularly in popularity and growth. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Cline leads in popularity with 70,365 stars vs 28,504 stars for Qwen Code. The 147% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Cline has 7,666 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Cline is growing faster, adding 2,248 stars in the last 30 days (+3.3%) against adding 0 stars for Qwen Code (0%). Cline is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Cline last updated 2 hours ago and Qwen Code 2 hours ago.
Both projects started around the same time, with Cline beginning 2 years ago and Qwen Code 1 year ago.
Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in AI Coding Agents.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs