Ad
 
Learn More

Cline vs Qwen Code

Learn how Cline and Qwen Code differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ai coding agents is best for you.

vs
Favicon of Cline

Cline

AI
AI coding agent that runs inside VS Code and the terminal, supporting multi-file edits, bash execution, and any LLM provider via bring-your-own-key.
70,365stars+2,248(+3.3%)

Last 30 days

Screenshot of Cline
Favicon of Qwen Code

Qwen Code

AI
Terminal-based AI coding agent that reads your codebase, edits files and runs commands, with support for Qwen, OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini and local models.
Screenshot of Qwen Code

Detailed Comparison

Cline appears to have several advantages over Qwen Code, particularly in popularity and growth. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Cline wins
Community & Popularity

Cline leads in popularity with 70,365 stars vs 28,504 stars for Qwen Code. The 147% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Cline has 7,666 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Cline wins
Growth Momentum

Cline is growing faster, adding 2,248 stars in the last 30 days (+3.3%) against adding 0 stars for Qwen Code (0%). Cline is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Comparable
Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Cline last updated 2 hours ago and Qwen Code 2 hours ago.

Comparable
Project Maturity

Both projects started around the same time, with Cline beginning 2 years ago and Qwen Code 1 year ago.

Comparable
Licensing

Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.

Comparable
Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in AI Coding Agents.