Learn how Cline and Codex CLI differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ai coding agents is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Stars
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Both Cline and Codex CLI have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Codex CLI leads in popularity with 129,383 stars vs 70,365 stars for Cline. The 84% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Codex CLI has 20,355 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Cline is growing faster, adding 2,248 stars in the last 30 days (+3.3%) against adding 0 stars for Codex CLI (0%). Cline is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Cline last updated 2 hours ago and Codex CLI 1 hour ago.
Both projects started around the same time, with Cline beginning 2 years ago and Codex CLI 2 years ago.
Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in AI Coding Agents.