Ad
 
Learn More

Cline vs Codex CLI

Learn how Cline and Codex CLI differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ai coding agents is best for you.

vs
Favicon of Cline

Cline

AI
AI coding agent that runs inside VS Code and the terminal, supporting multi-file edits, bash execution, and any LLM provider via bring-your-own-key.
70,365stars+2,248(+3.3%)

Last 30 days

Screenshot of Cline
Favicon of Codex CLI

Codex CLI

AI
Terminal-based AI coding agent that inspects files, edits code, runs commands, and integrates into CI pipelines using OpenAI's Codex models.
Screenshot of Codex CLI

Detailed Comparison

Both Cline and Codex CLI have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Codex CLI wins
Community & Popularity

Codex CLI leads in popularity with 129,383 stars vs 70,365 stars for Cline. The 84% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Codex CLI has 20,355 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Cline wins
Growth Momentum

Cline is growing faster, adding 2,248 stars in the last 30 days (+3.3%) against adding 0 stars for Codex CLI (0%). Cline is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable
Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Cline last updated 2 hours ago and Codex CLI 1 hour ago.

Comparable
Project Maturity

Both projects started around the same time, with Cline beginning 2 years ago and Codex CLI 2 years ago.

Comparable
Licensing

Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.

Comparable
Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in AI Coding Agents.