Learn how Cline and SWE-agent differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ai coding agents is best for you.
Both Cline and SWE-agent have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Cline significantly outpaces SWE-agent in community adoption with 65,798 stars compared to 20,016 stars on GitHub. This 3.3x difference suggests Cline has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Cline has 7,062 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Cline last updated 10 hours ago and SWE-agent 4 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Cline uses Typescript, JSX, Ruby.
Both projects started around the same time, with Cline beginning 2 years ago and SWE-agent 2 years ago.
SWE-agent uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Cline's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in AI Coding Agents. However, they also have distinct specializations: Cline also focuses on AI Assisted Coding.
Clinevs
OpenHandsActivity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Repository age
Version
License
Repository
License
Repository
Sent – A unified API for sending messages across SMS, RCS, and apps like WhatsApp.
