Learn how Cline and SWE-agent differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ai coding agents is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v4.1.26License
Apache-2.0Repository
cline/cline
Last 30 days
Last commit
6 days agoRepository age
3 yearsVersion
v1.1.0License
MITRepository
swe-agent/swe-agent
Both Cline and SWE-agent have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Cline significantly outpaces SWE-agent in community adoption with 71,455 stars compared to 20,755 stars on GitHub. This 3.4x difference suggests Cline has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Cline has 7,890 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Cline is growing faster, adding 1,382 stars in the last 30 days (+2%) against adding 244 stars for SWE-agent (+1.2%). Cline is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Cline last updated 2 days ago and SWE-agent 6 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Cline uses Typescript, JSX, Ruby.
Both projects started around the same time, with Cline beginning 2 years ago and SWE-agent 3 years ago.
SWE-agent uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Cline's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in AI Coding Agents.