Logto – Modern auth infrastructure for developers. Add multi-tenancy, enterprise SSO, and RBAC to your SaaS or AI apps.Learn how Onyx and OpenSearch differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these tools is best for you.
Both Onyx and OpenSearch have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Onyx leads in popularity with 31,238 stars vs 13,400 stars for OpenSearch. The 133% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Onyx has 4,298 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Onyx last updated 4 hours ago and OpenSearch 21 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Onyx uses JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Next.js while OpenSearch leverages Java.
OpenSearch has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Onyx which began 3 years ago. This 2.3-year head start suggests OpenSearch may have more mature features and established processes.
OpenSearch is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Onyx's license terms are not publicly specified.
Onyx also focuses on Enterprise Knowledge Search while OpenSearch extends into Search Engines.
Onyx provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while OpenSearch may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
OpenSearchvs
MeilisearchActivity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository
