Learn how Meilisearch and Onyx differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these tools is best for you.

Meilisearch appears to have several advantages over Onyx, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Meilisearch leads in popularity with 58,726 stars vs 31,167 stars for Onyx. The 88% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Onyx has 4,289 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Meilisearch last updated 2 days ago and Onyx 14 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Meilisearch uses Rust while Onyx leverages JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Python, Next.js.
Meilisearch has been in development longer, starting 8 years ago, compared to Onyx which began 3 years ago. This 5.1-year head start suggests Meilisearch may have more mature features and established processes.
Meilisearch is licensed under MIT, while Onyx's license terms are not publicly specified.
Meilisearch also focuses on Search Engines while Onyx extends into Enterprise Knowledge Search.
Both Meilisearch and Onyx offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.

Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository
Self-hosted
Repository