Learn how Meilisearch and Onyx differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these search engines is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Meilisearch appears to have several advantages over Onyx, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Meilisearch leads in popularity with 57,310 stars vs 28,479 stars for Onyx. The 101% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Onyx has 3,791 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Meilisearch last updated 12 hours ago and Onyx 12 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Meilisearch uses Rust while Onyx leverages JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Python, Next.js.
Meilisearch has been in development longer, starting 8 years ago, compared to Onyx which began 3 years ago. This 5.1-year head start suggests Meilisearch may have more mature features and established processes.
Meilisearch is licensed under MIT, while Onyx's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Search Engines. However, they also have distinct specializations: Meilisearch also focuses on Developer Tools while Onyx extends into AI Search Tools.
Both Meilisearch and Onyx offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.