Learn how Meilisearch and OpenSearch differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these search engines is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Meilisearch appears to have several advantages over OpenSearch, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Meilisearch significantly outpaces OpenSearch in community adoption with 59,181 stars compared to 13,661 stars on GitHub. This 4.3x difference suggests Meilisearch has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, OpenSearch has 2,948 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
OpenSearch is growing faster, adding 189 stars in the last 30 days (+1.4%) against adding 291 stars for Meilisearch (+0.5%). OpenSearch is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Meilisearch last updated 3 days ago and OpenSearch 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Meilisearch uses Rust while OpenSearch leverages Python, Java.
Meilisearch has been in development longer, starting 8 years ago, compared to OpenSearch which began 6 years ago. This 2.8-year head start suggests Meilisearch may have more mature features and established processes.
Meilisearch uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than OpenSearch's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Search Engines.
Both Meilisearch and OpenSearch offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.