What is the main difference between OpenSearch and Quickwit?

OpenSearch and Quickwit are both search engines but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: OpenSearch or Quickwit?

The choice between OpenSearch and Quickwit depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from OpenSearch to Quickwit?

Migration between OpenSearch and Quickwit is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Openlane – Open-source, developer-first platform for automated compliance, risk management, and built-in Trust Center.

Learn More

OpenSearch vs Quickwit

Learn how OpenSearch and Quickwit differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these search engines is best for you.

OpenSearch

Community-driven, Apache 2.0-licensed search and analytics suite for ingesting, searching, visualizing, and analyzing data at scale with AI/ML capabilities.

Visit OpenSearch Read more

13,877stars+156(+1.1%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
9 hours ago
Repository age
6 years
Version
3.9.0
License
Apache-2.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
opensearch

Quickwit

High-performance search engine designed for big data, offering scalability, real-time indexing, and cost-effective operations.

Visit Quickwit Read more

11,723stars+81(+0.7%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
9 hours ago
Repository age
6 years
Version
v0.9.2
License
Apache-2.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
quickwit

Detailed Comparison

Both OpenSearch and Quickwit have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Comparable

Community & Popularity

Both tools have similar popularity levels, with OpenSearch having 13,877 stars and Quickwit having 11,723 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, OpenSearch has 3,006 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

OpenSearch wins

Growth Momentum

OpenSearch is growing faster, adding 156 stars in the last 30 days (+1.1%) against adding 81 stars for Quickwit (+0.7%). OpenSearch is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with OpenSearch last updated 9 hours ago and Quickwit 9 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: OpenSearch uses Java while Quickwit leverages JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Rust.

Comparable