Learn how Quickwit and Swirl Search differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Quickwit appears to have several advantages over Swirl Search, particularly in popularity and growth. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Quickwit significantly outpaces Swirl Search in community adoption with 11,539 stars compared to 3,042 stars on GitHub. This 3.8x difference suggests Quickwit has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Quickwit has 581 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Quickwit is growing faster, adding 107 stars in the last 30 days (+0.9%) against adding 6 stars for Swirl Search (+0.2%). Quickwit is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Quickwit last updated 1 hour ago and Swirl Search 7 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Quickwit uses JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Rust while Swirl Search leverages SCSS, Ruby.
Both projects started around the same time, with Quickwit beginning 5 years ago and Swirl Search 4 years ago.
Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Quickwit also focuses on Search Engines while Swirl Search extends into Enterprise Knowledge Search.
Both Quickwit and Swirl Search offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.