Learn how Manticore Search and OpenSearch differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these search engines is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
13 hours agoRepository age
9 yearsVersion
29.9.0License
GPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
manticoresearch
Last 30 days
Last commit
15 hours agoRepository age
6 yearsVersion
3.9.0License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
opensearch
Both Manticore Search and OpenSearch have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Manticore Search having 12,075 stars and OpenSearch having 13,964 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, OpenSearch has 3,088 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
OpenSearch is growing faster, adding 148 stars in the last 30 days (+1.1%) against adding 33 stars for Manticore Search (+0.3%). OpenSearch is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Manticore Search last updated 13 hours ago and OpenSearch 15 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, Python, Java. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Manticore Search uses C, Objective-C, PHP, C++, Ruby, C#, Perl.
Manticore Search has been in development longer, starting 9 years ago, compared to OpenSearch which began 6 years ago. This 3.6-year head start suggests Manticore Search may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Manticore Search is licensed under GPL-3.0 while OpenSearch uses Apache-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Search Engines.
Both Manticore Search and OpenSearch offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.