Learn how Manticore Search and SeekStorm differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these search engines is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Manticore Search appears to have several advantages over SeekStorm, particularly in popularity, growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Manticore Search significantly outpaces SeekStorm in community adoption with 11,986 stars compared to 1,907 stars on GitHub. This 6.3x difference suggests Manticore Search has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Manticore Search has 642 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Manticore Search is growing faster, adding 67 stars in the last 30 days (+0.6%) against adding 2 stars for SeekStorm (+0.1%). Manticore Search is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Manticore Search last updated 2 hours ago and SeekStorm 52 minutes ago.
Manticore Search uses Bash, Python, C, Objective-C, PHP, Java, C++, Ruby, C#, Perl while SeekStorm leverages JavaScript, CSS, SCSS, Rust.
Manticore Search has been in development longer, starting 9 years ago, compared to SeekStorm which began 3 years ago. This 6.8-year head start suggests Manticore Search may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Manticore Search is licensed under GPL-3.0 while SeekStorm uses Apache-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Search Engines.
Both Manticore Search and SeekStorm offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.