Learn how Manticore Search and Meilisearch differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these search engines is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Meilisearch appears to have several advantages over Manticore Search, particularly in popularity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Meilisearch significantly outpaces Manticore Search in community adoption with 59,181 stars compared to 11,988 stars on GitHub. This 4.9x difference suggests Meilisearch has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Meilisearch has 2,694 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Manticore Search and Meilisearch are moving at much the same rate, adding 66 stars and adding 291 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.6% vs +0.5%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Manticore Search last updated 2 days ago and Meilisearch 3 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Manticore Search uses Python, C, Objective-C, PHP, Java, C++, Ruby, C#, Perl while Meilisearch leverages Rust.
Both projects started around the same time, with Manticore Search beginning 9 years ago and Meilisearch 8 years ago.
Meilisearch uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Manticore Search's GPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Search Engines.
Both Manticore Search and Meilisearch offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.