Learn how Manticore Search and Onyx differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these tools is best for you.

Both Manticore Search and Onyx have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Onyx leads in popularity with 31,167 stars vs 11,906 stars for Manticore Search. The 162% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Onyx has 4,289 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Manticore Search last updated 1 day ago and Onyx 14 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Manticore Search uses C, Objective-C, PHP, Java, C++, Ruby, C#, Perl while Onyx leverages JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Next.js.
Manticore Search has been in development longer, starting 9 years ago, compared to Onyx which began 3 years ago. This 5.9-year head start suggests Manticore Search may have more mature features and established processes.
Manticore Search is licensed under GPL-3.0, while Onyx's license terms are not publicly specified.
Manticore Search also focuses on Search Engines while Onyx extends into Enterprise Knowledge Search.
Onyx provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Manticore Search may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.

Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository
Self-hosted
Repository