Learn how Manticore Search and Onyx differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Onyx appears to have several advantages over Manticore Search, particularly in popularity, growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Onyx leads in popularity with 31,762 stars vs 11,956 stars for Manticore Search. The 166% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Onyx has 4,376 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Onyx is growing faster, adding 553 stars in the last 30 days (+1.8%) against adding 43 stars for Manticore Search (+0.4%). Onyx is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Manticore Search last updated 11 hours ago and Onyx 11 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Manticore Search uses C, Objective-C, PHP, Java, C++, Ruby, C#, Perl while Onyx leverages JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Next.js.
Manticore Search has been in development longer, starting 9 years ago, compared to Onyx which began 3 years ago. This 5.9-year head start suggests Manticore Search may have more mature features and established processes.
Onyx uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Manticore Search's GPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Manticore Search also focuses on Search Engines while Onyx extends into Enterprise Knowledge Search.
Both Manticore Search and Onyx offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.