Learn how Onyx and Pipeshub differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these enterprise knowledge search is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Onyx appears to have several advantages over Pipeshub, particularly in popularity, maturity, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Onyx significantly outpaces Pipeshub in community adoption with 31,762 stars compared to 3,686 stars on GitHub. This 8.6x difference suggests Onyx has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Onyx has 4,376 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Pipeshub is growing faster, adding 573 stars in the last 30 days (+18%) against adding 553 stars for Onyx (+1.8%). Pipeshub is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Onyx last updated 11 hours ago and Pipeshub 11 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python, Next.js.
Onyx has been in development longer, starting 3 years ago, compared to Pipeshub which began 1 year ago. This 1.9-year head start suggests Onyx may have more mature features and established processes.
Onyx uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Pipeshub's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Enterprise Knowledge Search.
Onyx provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Pipeshub may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.