Learn how Onyx and Pipeshub differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these enterprise knowledge search is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Onyx appears to have several advantages over Pipeshub, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Onyx significantly outpaces Pipeshub in community adoption with 32,279 stars compared to 3,784 stars on GitHub. This 8.5x difference suggests Onyx has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Onyx has 4,512 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Pipeshub is growing faster, adding 86 stars in the last 30 days (+2.3%) against adding 436 stars for Onyx (+1.4%). Pipeshub is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Onyx last updated 5 hours ago and Pipeshub 9 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python, Next.js.
Onyx has been in development longer, starting 3 years ago, compared to Pipeshub which began 2 years ago. This 1.9-year head start suggests Onyx may have more mature features and established processes.
Onyx uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Pipeshub's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Enterprise Knowledge Search.
Both Onyx and Pipeshub offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.