Learn how Omni and Onyx differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these enterprise knowledge search is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
27 days agoRepository age
1 yearVersion
v0.1.26License
Apache-2.0Repository
getomnico/omni
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
4 yearsVersion
v5.0.0License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
onyx-dot-app/onyx
Onyx appears to have several advantages over Omni, particularly in popularity, maturity, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Onyx significantly outpaces Omni in community adoption with 32,990 stars compared to 807 stars on GitHub. This 40.9x difference suggests Onyx has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Onyx has 4,644 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Omni and Onyx are moving at much the same rate, adding 17 stars and adding 732 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+2.2% vs +2.3%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Omni last updated 27 days ago and Onyx 1 day ago.
Onyx has been in development longer, starting 4 years ago, compared to Omni which began 1 year ago. This 2.4-year head start suggests Onyx may have more mature features and established processes.
Onyx uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Omni's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Enterprise Knowledge Search.
Onyx provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Omni may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.