Logto – Modern auth infrastructure for developers. Add multi-tenancy, enterprise SSO, and RBAC to your SaaS or AI apps.Learn how Onyx and Trieve differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these tools is best for you.
Both Onyx and Trieve have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Onyx significantly outpaces Trieve in community adoption with 31,176 stars compared to 2,696 stars on GitHub. This 11.6x difference suggests Onyx has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Onyx has 4,290 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Onyx shows more recent development activity with its last commit 22 hours ago, while Trieve was last updated 6 months ago. This suggests Onyx is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python, Next.js. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Trieve leverages Golang, Rust, Remix.
Both projects started around the same time, with Onyx beginning 3 years ago and Trieve 3 years ago.
Trieve is licensed under MIT, while Onyx's license terms are not publicly specified.
Onyx also focuses on Enterprise Knowledge Search while Trieve extends into API Infrastructure, AI Search Tools, LLM Application Frameworks.
Both Onyx and Trieve offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository
License
Self-hosted
Repository
