Learn how Onyx and Typesense differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these tools is best for you.

Typesense appears to have several advantages over Onyx, particularly in maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Onyx having 31,176 stars and Typesense having 26,356 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Onyx has 4,290 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Onyx last updated 22 hours ago and Typesense 8 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Onyx uses CSS, JSX, Python, Next.js while Typesense leverages C, Objective-C, C++.
Typesense has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Onyx which began 3 years ago. This 6.4-year head start suggests Typesense may have more mature features and established processes.
Typesense is licensed under GPL-3.0, while Onyx's license terms are not publicly specified.
Onyx also focuses on Enterprise Knowledge Search while Typesense extends into Search Engines.
Both Onyx and Typesense offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.

vs
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository