Learn how Onyx and Typesense differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these search engines is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Typesense appears to have several advantages over Onyx, particularly in maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Onyx having 28,479 stars and Typesense having 25,712 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Onyx has 3,791 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Onyx last updated 13 hours ago and Typesense 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Onyx uses CSS, JSX, Python, Next.js while Typesense leverages C, Objective-C, C++.
Typesense has been in development longer, starting 9 years ago, compared to Onyx which began 3 years ago. This 6.4-year head start suggests Typesense may have more mature features and established processes.
Typesense is licensed under GPL-3.0, while Onyx's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Search Engines. However, they also have distinct specializations: Onyx also focuses on AI Search Tools.
Both Onyx and Typesense offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.