Learn how Latitude and OpenLLMetry differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these llm observability & evaluation tools is best for you.

Both Latitude and OpenLLMetry have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OpenLLMetry leads in popularity with 7,340 stars vs 4,498 stars for Latitude. The 63% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, OpenLLMetry has 1,035 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Latitude last updated 15 hours ago and OpenLLMetry 17 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Latitude uses JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, SvelteKit while OpenLLMetry leverages Python.
Both projects started around the same time, with Latitude beginning 2 years ago and OpenLLMetry 3 years ago.
Latitude uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than OpenLLMetry's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in LLM Observability & Evaluation.
Latitude provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while OpenLLMetry may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.

Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository