Learn how Latitude and OpenLLMetry differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these llm observability & evaluation is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Latitude appears to have several advantages over OpenLLMetry, particularly in growth, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OpenLLMetry leads in popularity with 7,385 stars vs 4,595 stars for Latitude. The 61% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, OpenLLMetry has 1,055 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Latitude is growing faster, adding 136 stars in the last 30 days (+3.1%) against adding 73 stars for OpenLLMetry (+1%). Latitude is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Latitude last updated 9 hours ago and OpenLLMetry 10 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Latitude uses JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, SvelteKit while OpenLLMetry leverages Python.
Both projects started around the same time, with Latitude beginning 2 years ago and OpenLLMetry 3 years ago.
Latitude uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than OpenLLMetry's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in LLM Observability & Evaluation.
Latitude provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while OpenLLMetry may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.