Learn how Latitude and OpenLLMetry differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these llm observability & evaluation is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
7.18.0License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
latitude-llm
Last 30 days
Last commit
3 days agoRepository age
3 yearsVersion
0.63.0License
Apache-2.0Repository
openllmetry
Both Latitude and OpenLLMetry have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OpenLLMetry leads in popularity with 7,527 stars vs 4,746 stars for Latitude. The 59% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, OpenLLMetry has 1,188 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Latitude and OpenLLMetry are moving at much the same rate, adding 30 stars and adding 47 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.6% vs +0.6%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Latitude last updated 2 days ago and OpenLLMetry 3 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Latitude uses JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, SvelteKit while OpenLLMetry leverages Python.
Both projects started around the same time, with Latitude beginning 2 years ago and OpenLLMetry 3 years ago.
Latitude uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than OpenLLMetry's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in LLM Observability & Evaluation.
Latitude provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while OpenLLMetry may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.