Learn how Arize Phoenix and Latitude differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these llm observability & evaluation is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Arize Phoenix appears to have several advantages over Latitude, particularly in popularity, growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Arize Phoenix leads in popularity with 11,016 stars vs 4,577 stars for Latitude. The 141% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Arize Phoenix has 1,055 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Arize Phoenix is growing faster, adding 482 stars in the last 30 days (+4.6%) against adding 152 stars for Latitude (+3.4%). Arize Phoenix is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Arize Phoenix last updated 12 hours ago and Latitude 14 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Arize Phoenix uses Python while Latitude leverages SvelteKit.
Arize Phoenix has been in development longer, starting 4 years ago, compared to Latitude which began 2 years ago. This 1.7-year head start suggests Arize Phoenix may have more mature features and established processes.
Latitude uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Arize Phoenix's Elastic-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in LLM Observability & Evaluation.
Both Arize Phoenix and Latitude offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.