Learn how LangWatch and Latitude differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these llm observability & evaluation is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Latitude appears to have several advantages over LangWatch, particularly in growth, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with LangWatch having 3,504 stars and Latitude having 4,599 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Latitude has 381 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Latitude is growing faster, adding 122 stars in the last 30 days (+2.7%) against adding 18 stars for LangWatch (+0.5%). Latitude is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with LangWatch last updated 10 hours ago and Latitude 2 days ago.
Both projects started around the same time, with LangWatch beginning 3 years ago and Latitude 2 years ago.
Latitude uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than LangWatch's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in LLM Observability & Evaluation.
Latitude provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while LangWatch may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.