What is the main difference between Helicone and Latitude?

Helicone and Latitude are both llm observability & evaluation but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Helicone or Latitude?

The choice between Helicone and Latitude depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Helicone to Latitude?

Migration between Helicone and Latitude is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Stellar Hosted – Managed Open Source software hosting in the EU: secure, compliant, fast.

Learn more

Helicone vs Latitude

Learn how Helicone and Latitude differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these llm observability & evaluation is best for you.

Helicone

Open-source platform for logging, monitoring, and debugging LLM applications. Route, debug, and analyze AI apps with comprehensive observability tools.

Visit Helicone Read more

6,273stars+64(+1%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
11 days ago
Repository age
4 years
Version
v2025.08.21-1
License
Apache-2.0
Repository
helicone/helicone

Latitude

Open-source platform for monitoring AI agents: captures traces, surfaces failure patterns, alerts on issues, and helps you verify fixes with automated evals.

Visit Latitude Read more

4,746stars+30(+0.6%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
2 days ago
Repository age
2 years
Version
7.18.0
License
MIT
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
latitude-llm

Detailed Comparison

Both Helicone and Latitude have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Comparable

Community & Popularity

Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Helicone having 6,273 stars and Latitude having 4,746 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Helicone has 703 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

Helicone wins

Growth Momentum

Helicone is growing faster, adding 64 stars in the last 30 days (+1%) against adding 30 stars for Latitude (+0.6%). Helicone is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Helicone last updated 11 days ago and Latitude 2 days ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Helicone uses Python, Next.js while Latitude leverages SvelteKit.

Helicone wins

Project Maturity

Helicone has been in development longer, starting 4 years ago, compared to Latitude which began 2 years ago. This 1.4-year head start suggests Helicone may have more mature features and established processes.

Latitude wins

Licensing

Latitude uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Helicone's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in LLM Observability & Evaluation.

Latitude wins

Hosting & Deployment

Latitude provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Helicone may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.