Learn how Helicone and OpenLLMetry differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these llm observability & evaluation is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
11 days agoRepository age
4 yearsVersion
v2025.08.21-1License
Apache-2.0Repository
helicone/helicone
Last 30 days
Last commit
3 days agoRepository age
3 yearsVersion
0.63.0License
Apache-2.0Repository
openllmetry
Both Helicone and OpenLLMetry have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Helicone having 6,273 stars and OpenLLMetry having 7,527 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, OpenLLMetry has 1,188 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Helicone is growing faster, adding 64 stars in the last 30 days (+1%) against adding 47 stars for OpenLLMetry (+0.6%). Helicone is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Helicone last updated 11 days ago and OpenLLMetry 3 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Helicone uses JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Next.js.
Both projects started around the same time, with Helicone beginning 4 years ago and OpenLLMetry 3 years ago.
Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in LLM Observability & Evaluation.