Learn how LangWatch and OpenLLMetry differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these llm observability & evaluation is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 hours agoRepository age
3 yearsVersion
3.21.0License
Apache-2.0Repository
langwatch/langwatch
Last 30 days
Last commit
5 days agoRepository age
3 yearsVersion
0.62.4License
Apache-2.0Repository
openllmetry
Both LangWatch and OpenLLMetry have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OpenLLMetry leads in popularity with 7,504 stars vs 4,991 stars for LangWatch. The 50% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, OpenLLMetry has 1,168 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
LangWatch is growing faster, adding 119 stars in the last 30 days (+2.4%) against adding 57 stars for OpenLLMetry (+0.8%). LangWatch is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with LangWatch last updated 2 hours ago and OpenLLMetry 5 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: LangWatch uses JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Golang, SCSS, Ruby.
Both projects started around the same time, with LangWatch beginning 3 years ago and OpenLLMetry 3 years ago.
Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in LLM Observability & Evaluation.