Learn how **OpenLIT ** and OpenLLMetry differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these llm observability & evaluation is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
19 hours agoRepository age
3 yearsVersion
2.1.1License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
openlit/openlit
Last 30 days
Last commit
3 days agoRepository age
3 yearsVersion
0.63.0License
Apache-2.0Repository
openllmetry
Both **OpenLIT ** and OpenLLMetry have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OpenLLMetry leads in popularity with 7,527 stars vs 2,965 stars for **OpenLIT **. The 154% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, OpenLLMetry has 1,188 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
OpenLIT ** is growing faster, adding 131 stars in the last 30 days (+4.6%) against adding 47 stars for OpenLLMetry (+0.6%**). OpenLIT is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with **OpenLIT ** last updated 19 hours ago and OpenLLMetry 3 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: **OpenLIT ** uses JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Next.js, Golang, C, Objective-C.
Both projects started around the same time, with **OpenLIT ** beginning 3 years ago and OpenLLMetry 3 years ago.
Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in LLM Observability & Evaluation.
**OpenLIT ** provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while OpenLLMetry may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.