Langfuse vs Latitude
Learn how Langfuse and Latitude differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these llm observability & evaluation is best for you.
Learn how Langfuse and Latitude differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these llm observability & evaluation is best for you.
Langfuse
Last 30 days
Last commit
11 hours agoRepository age
3 yearsVersion
v4.27.0License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
langfuse/langfuse
Latitude
Last 30 days
Last commit
12 hours agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
4.1.0License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
latitude-dev/latitude-llm
Detailed Comparison
Langfuse appears to have several advantages over Latitude, particularly in popularity, growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Langfuse appears to have several advantages over Latitude, particularly in popularity, growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
Langfuse significantly outpaces Latitude in community adoption with 34,050 stars compared to 4,610 stars on GitHub. This 7.4x difference suggests Langfuse has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Langfuse has 3,676 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Growth Momentum
Langfuse is growing faster, adding 1,755 stars in the last 30 days (+5.4%) against adding 96 stars for Latitude (+2.1%). Langfuse is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Development Activity
Both projects show recent activity, with Langfuse last updated 11 hours ago and Latitude 12 hours ago.
Technology Stack
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Langfuse uses Next.js while Latitude leverages SvelteKit.
Project Maturity
Langfuse has been in development longer, starting 3 years ago, compared to Latitude which began 2 years ago. This 1.1-year head start suggests Langfuse may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in LLM Observability & Evaluation.
Hosting & Deployment
Both Langfuse and Latitude offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
c15t – Open-source cookie banner, built for control and lightening fast modern web apps.