Learn how Arize Phoenix and Spanlens differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these llm observability & evaluation is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Arize Phoenix and Spanlens have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Arize Phoenix significantly outpaces Spanlens in community adoption with 11,113 stars compared to 12 stars on GitHub. This 926.1x difference suggests Arize Phoenix has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Arize Phoenix has 1,067 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Arize Phoenix last updated 6 hours ago and Spanlens 18 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Spanlens leverages Next.js.
Arize Phoenix has been in development longer, starting 4 years ago, compared to Spanlens which began 4 months ago. This 3.5-year head start suggests Arize Phoenix may have more mature features and established processes.
Spanlens uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Arize Phoenix's Elastic-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in LLM Observability & Evaluation.
Both Arize Phoenix and Spanlens offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.