Learn how Kitty and WezTerm differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these terminal emulators is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Repository

Both Kitty and WezTerm have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Kitty having 35,296 stars and WezTerm having 29,237 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, WezTerm has 1,798 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Kitty and WezTerm are moving at much the same rate, adding 387 stars and adding 329 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+1.1% vs +1.1%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Kitty last updated 8 hours ago and WezTerm 4 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Python, C, Objective-C, GLSL. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Kitty uses Golang, MATLAB while WezTerm leverages Rust.
Kitty has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to WezTerm which began 9 years ago. This 1.3-year head start suggests Kitty may have more mature features and established processes.
WezTerm uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Kitty's GPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Terminal Emulators. However, they also have distinct specializations: WezTerm extends into Terminal Multiplexers.