Learn how Kitty and WezTerm differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these terminal emulators is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Activity score

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Activity score

Kitty appears to have several advantages over WezTerm, particularly in maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Kitty having 33,452 stars and WezTerm having 26,647 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, WezTerm has 1,500 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Kitty last updated 6 hours ago and WezTerm 6 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Python, C, Objective-C, GLSL. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Kitty uses Golang, MATLAB while WezTerm leverages Rust.
Kitty has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to WezTerm which began 8 years ago. This 1.3-year head start suggests Kitty may have more mature features and established processes.
Kitty is licensed under GPL-3.0, while WezTerm's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Terminal Emulators. However, they also have distinct specializations: WezTerm extends into Terminal Multiplexers.