Learn how Ghostty and Kitty differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these terminal emulators is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
15 hours agoRepository age
5 yearsLicense
MITRepository
ghostty-org/ghostty
Last 30 days
Last commit
8 hours agoRepository age
10 yearsVersion
v0.50.0License
GPL-3.0Repository
kovidgoyal/kitty
Ghostty appears to have several advantages over Kitty, particularly in popularity, growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Ghostty leads in popularity with 64,062 stars vs 35,672 stars for Kitty. The 80% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Ghostty has 3,911 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Ghostty is growing faster, adding 1,855 stars in the last 30 days (+3%) against adding 391 stars for Kitty (+1.1%). Ghostty is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Ghostty last updated 15 hours ago and Kitty 8 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with CSS, Bash, Python, C, Objective-C, MATLAB, GLSL. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Ghostty uses Swift, C++, Zig while Kitty leverages JavaScript, Golang.
Kitty has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Ghostty which began 5 years ago. This 5.5-year head start suggests Kitty may have more mature features and established processes.
Ghostty uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Kitty's GPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Terminal Emulators.