iTerm 2 vs Kitty
Learn how iTerm 2 and Kitty differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these developer tools is best for you.
Learn how iTerm 2 and Kitty differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these developer tools is best for you.
iTerm 2
Stars
17,412Forks
1,360Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
15 yearsLicense
GPL-2.0
Auto-fetched .
Kitty
Stars
32,435Forks
1,347Last commit
14 hours agoRepository age
10 yearsLicense
GPL-3.0
Auto-fetched .
Detailed Comparison
Both iTerm 2 and Kitty have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both iTerm 2 and Kitty have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
Kitty leads in popularity with 32,435 stars vs 17,412 stars for iTerm 2. The 86% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, iTerm 2 has 1,360 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Development Activity
Both projects show recent activity, with iTerm 2 last updated 2 days ago and Kitty 14 hours ago.
Project Maturity
iTerm 2 has been in development longer, starting 15 years ago, compared to Kitty which began 10 years ago. This 5.6-year head start suggests iTerm 2 may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
The projects use different licenses: iTerm 2 is licensed under GPL-2.0 while Kitty uses GPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in Developer Tools.
Efficient App – Not all Open Source alternatives are equal — Narrow down the best, without the bullsh*t.