What is the main difference between iTerm 2 and Kitty?

iTerm 2 and Kitty are both terminal emulators but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: iTerm 2 or Kitty?

The choice between iTerm 2 and Kitty depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from iTerm 2 to Kitty?

Migration between iTerm 2 and Kitty is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Databuddy – AI-Native Web & Product Analytics you can trust, turn manual dashboards into automated insights.

Start Tracking Free

Learn more

iTerm 2 vs Kitty

Learn how iTerm 2 and Kitty differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these terminal emulators is best for you.

iTerm 2

Feature-rich terminal replacement for macOS with split panes, search, autocomplete, and extensive customization options for enhanced productivity.

Visit iTerm 2 Read more

Stars
17,731
Forks
1,415
Last commit
4 hours ago
Repository age
15 years
License
GPL-2.0

Activity score

93/100

View Repository

Kitty

High-performance terminal emulator with GPU acceleration, graphics support, and advanced scripting capabilities for developers and system administrators.

Visit Kitty Read more

Stars
33,585
Forks
1,399
Last commit
3 hours ago
Repository age
10 years
License
GPL-3.0

Activity score

95/100

View Repository

Detailed Comparison

Both iTerm 2 and Kitty have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Kitty wins

Community & Popularity

Kitty leads in popularity with 33,585 stars vs 17,731 stars for iTerm 2. The 89% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, iTerm 2 has 1,415 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with iTerm 2 last updated 4 hours ago and Kitty 3 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Python, C, Objective-C, MATLAB. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: iTerm 2 uses C++, Ruby, Swift while Kitty leverages Golang, GLSL.

iTerm 2 wins

Project Maturity

iTerm 2 has been in development longer, starting 15 years ago, compared to Kitty which began 10 years ago. This 5.6-year head start suggests iTerm 2 may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable

Licensing

The projects use different licenses: iTerm 2 is licensed under GPL-2.0 while Kitty uses GPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.

Comparable