Openlane – Open-source, developer-first platform for automated compliance, risk management, and built-in Trust Center.Learn how Alacritty and iTerm 2 differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these terminal emulators is best for you.
Both Alacritty and iTerm 2 have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Alacritty significantly outpaces iTerm 2 in community adoption with 65,224 stars compared to 17,899 stars on GitHub. This 3.6x difference suggests Alacritty has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Alacritty has 3,542 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Alacritty last updated 15 hours ago and iTerm 2 9 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Alacritty uses Rust, GLSL while iTerm 2 leverages JavaScript, CSS, Python, C, Objective-C, Swift, C++, Ruby, MATLAB.
iTerm 2 has been in development longer, starting 15 years ago, compared to Alacritty which began 10 years ago. This 4.9-year head start suggests iTerm 2 may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Alacritty is licensed under Apache-2.0 while iTerm 2 uses GPL-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Terminal Emulators.
Alacrittyvs
WezTermActivity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Repository age
Version
License
Repository
Repository
