Learn how Alacritty and Ghostty differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these terminal emulators is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Both Alacritty and Ghostty have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Alacritty having 63,863 stars and Ghostty having 53,487 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Alacritty has 3,447 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Alacritty last updated 4 days ago and Ghostty 12 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, GLSL. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Alacritty uses Rust while Ghostty leverages CSS, Python, C, Objective-C, C++, Swift, MATLAB, Zig.
Alacritty has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Ghostty which began 4 years ago. This 6.2-year head start suggests Alacritty may have more mature features and established processes.
Ghostty uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Alacritty's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Terminal Emulators.