Ad
Capture – Capture screenshots, generate PDFs, scrape content, extract metadata, and automate browsers with one API.Learn More
Capture – Capture screenshots, generate PDFs, scrape content, extract metadata, and automate browsers with one API.Capture – Capture screenshots, generate PDFs, scrape content, extract metadata, and automate browsers with one API.Learn how Ghostty and WezTerm differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these terminal emulators is best for you.
Both Ghostty and WezTerm have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Ghostty leads in popularity with 58,689 stars vs 27,935 stars for WezTerm. The 110% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Ghostty has 3,135 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Ghostty last updated 11 hours ago and WezTerm 10 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with CSS, Bash, Python, C, Objective-C, GLSL. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Ghostty uses Swift, C++, MATLAB, Zig while WezTerm leverages JavaScript, Rust.
WezTerm has been in development longer, starting 8 years ago, compared to Ghostty which began 4 years ago. This 4.2-year head start suggests WezTerm may have more mature features and established processes.
Ghostty is licensed under MIT, while WezTerm's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Terminal Emulators. However, they also have distinct specializations: WezTerm extends into Terminal Multiplexers.
Ghosttyvs
iTerm 2Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Repository age
License
Repository
