Learn how Ghostty and iTerm 2 differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these terminal emulators is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
21 hours agoRepository age
5 yearsLicense
MITRepository
ghostty-org/ghostty
Last 30 days
Last commit
3 hours agoRepository age
16 yearsLicense
GPL-2.0Repository
gnachman/iterm2
Ghostty appears to have several advantages over iTerm 2, particularly in popularity, growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Ghostty significantly outpaces iTerm 2 in community adoption with 62,566 stars compared to 18,214 stars on GitHub. This 3.4x difference suggests Ghostty has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Ghostty has 3,710 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Ghostty is growing faster, adding 1,057 stars in the last 30 days (+1.7%) against adding 119 stars for iTerm 2 (+0.7%). Ghostty is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Ghostty last updated 21 hours ago and iTerm 2 3 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with CSS, Bash, Python, C, Objective-C, Swift, C++, MATLAB. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Ghostty uses GLSL, Zig while iTerm 2 leverages JavaScript, Ruby.
iTerm 2 has been in development longer, starting 16 years ago, compared to Ghostty which began 5 years ago. This 11.1-year head start suggests iTerm 2 may have more mature features and established processes.
Ghostty uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than iTerm 2's GPL-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Terminal Emulators.