Learn how Ghostty and iTerm 2 differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these terminal emulators is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Both Ghostty and iTerm 2 have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Ghostty significantly outpaces iTerm 2 in community adoption with 55,913 stars compared to 17,643 stars on GitHub. This 3.2x difference suggests Ghostty has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Ghostty has 2,843 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Ghostty last updated 24 hours ago and iTerm 2 3 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with CSS, Bash, Python, C, Objective-C, C++, Swift, MATLAB. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Ghostty uses GLSL, Zig while iTerm 2 leverages JavaScript, Ruby.
iTerm 2 has been in development longer, starting 15 years ago, compared to Ghostty which began 4 years ago. This 11.1-year head start suggests iTerm 2 may have more mature features and established processes.
Ghostty uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than iTerm 2's GPL-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Terminal Emulators.