Learn how iTerm 2 and WezTerm differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these terminal emulators is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Activity score

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Activity score

Both iTerm 2 and WezTerm have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
WezTerm leads in popularity with 26,647 stars vs 17,697 stars for iTerm 2. The 51% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, WezTerm has 1,500 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with iTerm 2 last updated 8 hours ago and WezTerm 8 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Python, C, Objective-C. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: iTerm 2 uses Ruby, C++, Swift, MATLAB while WezTerm leverages Rust, GLSL.
iTerm 2 has been in development longer, starting 15 years ago, compared to WezTerm which began 8 years ago. This 6.9-year head start suggests iTerm 2 may have more mature features and established processes.
iTerm 2 is licensed under GPL-2.0, while WezTerm's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Terminal Emulators. However, they also have distinct specializations: WezTerm extends into Terminal Multiplexers.