Learn how iTerm 2 and WezTerm differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these terminal emulators is best for you.

Both iTerm 2 and WezTerm have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
WezTerm leads in popularity with 27,935 stars vs 17,869 stars for iTerm 2. The 56% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, WezTerm has 1,615 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with iTerm 2 last updated 19 hours ago and WezTerm 10 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Python, C, Objective-C. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: iTerm 2 uses Swift, C++, Ruby, MATLAB while WezTerm leverages Rust, GLSL.
iTerm 2 has been in development longer, starting 15 years ago, compared to WezTerm which began 8 years ago. This 6.9-year head start suggests iTerm 2 may have more mature features and established processes.
iTerm 2 is licensed under GPL-2.0, while WezTerm's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Terminal Emulators. However, they also have distinct specializations: WezTerm extends into Terminal Multiplexers.

vs
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Repository