Learn how Alacritty and WezTerm differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these terminal emulators is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Repository

Both Alacritty and WezTerm have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Alacritty leads in popularity with 65,622 stars vs 28,755 stars for WezTerm. The 128% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Alacritty has 3,591 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
WezTerm is growing faster, adding 556 stars in the last 30 days (+2%) against adding 367 stars for Alacritty (+0.6%). WezTerm is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Alacritty last updated 4 days ago and WezTerm 13 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, Rust, GLSL. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: WezTerm leverages JavaScript, CSS, Python, C, Objective-C.
Alacritty has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to WezTerm which began 9 years ago. This 2.0-year head start suggests Alacritty may have more mature features and established processes.
WezTerm uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Alacritty's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Terminal Emulators. However, they also have distinct specializations: WezTerm extends into Terminal Multiplexers.