Learn how Alacritty and Kitty differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these terminal emulators is best for you.

Both Alacritty and Kitty have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Alacritty leads in popularity with 65,224 stars vs 34,218 stars for Kitty. The 91% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Alacritty has 3,542 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Alacritty last updated 15 hours ago and Kitty 8 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, GLSL. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Alacritty uses Rust while Kitty leverages JavaScript, CSS, Python, Golang, C, Objective-C, MATLAB.
Both projects started around the same time, with Alacritty beginning 10 years ago and Kitty 10 years ago.
The projects use different licenses: Alacritty is licensed under Apache-2.0 while Kitty uses GPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Terminal Emulators.

vs
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Repository age
Version
License
Repository
License
Repository