Learn how Alacritty and Kitty differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these terminal emulators is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Both Alacritty and Kitty have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Alacritty leads in popularity with 65,885 stars vs 35,152 stars for Kitty. The 87% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Alacritty has 3,630 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Kitty is growing faster, adding 410 stars in the last 30 days (+1.2%) against adding 274 stars for Alacritty (+0.4%). Kitty is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Kitty shows more recent development activity with its last commit 6 hours ago, while Alacritty was last updated 1 month ago. This suggests Kitty is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, GLSL. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Alacritty uses Rust while Kitty leverages JavaScript, CSS, Python, Golang, C, Objective-C, MATLAB.
Both projects started around the same time, with Alacritty beginning 11 years ago and Kitty 10 years ago.
The projects use different licenses: Alacritty is licensed under Apache-2.0 while Kitty uses GPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Terminal Emulators.