Learn how Erxes and Tiledesk differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these customer communication platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Erxes and Tiledesk have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Erxes significantly outpaces Tiledesk in community adoption with 4,075 stars compared to 14 stars on GitHub. This 291.1x difference suggests Erxes has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Erxes has 1,307 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Erxes last updated 11 hours ago and Tiledesk 20 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Erxes uses JSX, Python, Next.js, Golang.
Erxes has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Tiledesk which began 9 years ago. This 1.2-year head start suggests Erxes may have more mature features and established processes.
Tiledesk uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Erxes's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Customer Communication Platforms. However, they also have distinct specializations: Erxes also focuses on CRM Systems, Marketing Automation while Tiledesk extends into AI Agent Platforms, Chatbot Platforms, Live Chat & Messaging.
Tiledesk provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Erxes may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs