Learn how Chatwoot and Tiledesk differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these customer communication platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Chatwoot and Tiledesk have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Chatwoot significantly outpaces Tiledesk in community adoption with 36,237 stars compared to 14 stars on GitHub. This 2588.4x difference suggests Chatwoot has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Chatwoot has 8,715 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Chatwoot last updated 19 hours ago and Tiledesk 20 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Chatwoot uses Vue, Ruby, Rails while Tiledesk leverages CSS.
Tiledesk has been in development longer, starting 9 years ago, compared to Chatwoot which began 7 years ago. This 1.6-year head start suggests Tiledesk may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Customer Communication Platforms, Live Chat & Messaging. However, they also have distinct specializations: Chatwoot also focuses on Helpdesk Software while Tiledesk extends into AI Agent Platforms, Chatbot Platforms.
Both Chatwoot and Tiledesk offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.