Learn how Chaskiq and Chatwoot differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these customer communication platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Chatwoot appears to have several advantages over Chaskiq, particularly in popularity, growth, activity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Chatwoot significantly outpaces Chaskiq in community adoption with 36,370 stars compared to 3,561 stars on GitHub. This 10.2x difference suggests Chatwoot has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Chatwoot has 8,774 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Chatwoot is growing faster, adding 1,047 stars in the last 30 days (+3%) against adding 15 stars for Chaskiq (+0.4%). Chatwoot is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Chatwoot shows more recent development activity with its last commit 12 hours ago, while Chaskiq was last updated 2 months ago. This suggests Chatwoot is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, SCSS, Ruby, Rails. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Chaskiq uses CSS, JSX while Chatwoot leverages Vue.
Chaskiq has been in development longer, starting 8 years ago, compared to Chatwoot which began 7 years ago. This 1.2-year head start suggests Chaskiq may have more mature features and established processes.
Chatwoot is licensed under MIT, while Chaskiq's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Customer Communication Platforms, Helpdesk Software, Live Chat & Messaging.
Both Chaskiq and Chatwoot offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.