Cap vs OpenScreen
Learn how Cap and OpenScreen differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these screen recording tools is best for you.
Learn how Cap and OpenScreen differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these screen recording tools is best for you.
Cap
Auto-fetched .
OpenScreen
Stars
33,881Forks
2,277Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
7 monthsLicense
MIT
Auto-fetched .
Detailed Comparison
Both Cap and OpenScreen have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Cap and OpenScreen have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
OpenScreen leads in popularity with 33,881 stars vs 18,412 stars for Cap. The 84% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, OpenScreen has 2,277 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Development Activity
Both projects show recent activity, with Cap last updated 13 hours ago and OpenScreen 1 day ago.
Technology Stack
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Cap uses Bash, Next.js, Rust, Tauri while OpenScreen leverages Python.
Project Maturity
Cap has been in development longer, starting 2 years ago, compared to OpenScreen which began 7 months ago. This 1.9-year head start suggests Cap may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
OpenScreen uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Cap's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in Screen Recording.
Hosting & Deployment
Cap provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while OpenScreen may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
c15t – Open-source cookie banner, built for control and lightening fast modern web apps.