Cap vs OpenScreen
Learn how Cap and OpenScreen differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these screen recording tools is best for you.
Learn how Cap and OpenScreen differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these screen recording tools is best for you.
Cap
Last 30 days
Last commit
8 hours agoRepository age
3 yearsVersion
v0.6.1License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
capsoftware/cap
OpenScreen
Last 30 days
Last commit
18 hours agoRepository age
8 monthsVersion
v2.1.2License
MITRepository
openscreen
Detailed Comparison
Both Cap and OpenScreen have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Cap and OpenScreen have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
Cap significantly outpaces OpenScreen in community adoption with 23,717 stars compared to 4,890 stars on GitHub. This 4.9x difference suggests Cap has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Cap has 2,149 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Growth Momentum
OpenScreen is growing faster, adding 1,666 stars in the last 30 days (+52%) against adding 911 stars for Cap (+4%). OpenScreen is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Development Activity
Both projects show recent activity, with Cap last updated 8 hours ago and OpenScreen 18 hours ago.
Project Maturity
Cap has been in development longer, starting 3 years ago, compared to OpenScreen which began 8 months ago. This 2.4-year head start suggests Cap may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
OpenScreen uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Cap's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in Screen Recording.
Hosting & Deployment
Cap provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while OpenScreen may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
Postiz – The All-in-One agentic social media scheduling tool