Cap vs Kap
Learn how Cap and Kap differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these screen recording tools is best for you.
Learn how Cap and Kap differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these screen recording tools is best for you.
Cap
Last 30 days
Last commit
16 hours agoRepository age
3 yearsVersion
v0.5.9License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
capsoftware/cap
Kap
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 years agoRepository age
10 yearsVersion
v3.6.0License
MITRepository
wulkano/kap
Detailed Comparison
Both Cap and Kap have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Cap and Kap have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Cap having 21,427 stars and Kap having 19,343 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Cap has 1,839 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Growth Momentum
Cap is growing faster, adding 983 stars in the last 30 days (+4.8%) against adding 37 stars for Kap (+0.2%). Cap is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Development Activity
Cap shows more recent development activity with its last commit 16 hours ago, while Kap was last updated 2 years ago. This suggests Cap is being more actively maintained.
Technology Stack
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Typescript, JSX, Next.js. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Cap uses CSS, Bash, Rust, Tauri.
Project Maturity
Kap has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Cap which began 3 years ago. This 7.4-year head start suggests Kap may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
Kap uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Cap's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in Screen Recording.
Hosting & Deployment
Cap provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Kap may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
ScreenshotOne – The screenshot API for developers. Render screenshots in one simple API call