Cap vs ShareX
Learn how Cap and ShareX differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these screen recording tools is best for you.
Learn how Cap and ShareX differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these screen recording tools is best for you.
Cap
Auto-fetched .
ShareX
Stars
36,366Forks
3,656Last commit
21 hours agoRepository age
13 yearsLicense
GPL-3.0
Auto-fetched .
Detailed Comparison
Both Cap and ShareX have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Cap and ShareX have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
ShareX leads in popularity with 36,366 stars vs 18,412 stars for Cap. The 98% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, ShareX has 3,656 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Development Activity
Both projects show recent activity, with Cap last updated 11 hours ago and ShareX 21 hours ago.
Technology Stack
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Cap uses JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js, Rust, Tauri while ShareX leverages C#.
Project Maturity
ShareX has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Cap which began 2 years ago. This 10.3-year head start suggests ShareX may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
The projects use different licenses: Cap is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while ShareX uses GPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in Screen Recording. However, they also have distinct specializations: ShareX extends into Screenshot Utilities.
Hosting & Deployment
Cap provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while ShareX may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
c15t – Open-source cookie banner, built for control and lightening fast modern web apps.