What is the main difference between Cap and ShareX?

Cap and ShareX are both screen recording tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Cap or ShareX?

The choice between Cap and ShareX depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Cap to ShareX?

Migration between Cap and ShareX is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Sent – A unified API for sending messages across SMS, RCS, and apps like WhatsApp.

Learn More

Learn more

Cap vs ShareX

Learn how Cap and ShareX differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these screen recording tools is best for you.

Cap

Record your screen or webcam, edit with backgrounds and effects, then share via link. Built on Rust and Tauri for native performance on macOS and Windows.

Visit Cap Read more

Stars
19,562
Forks
1,614
Last commit
6 hours ago
Repository age
3 years
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes

Activity score

94/100

View Repository

ShareX

ShareX is a free, open-source program that captures or records any area of your screen and shares it with a single keypress, supporting various file types and destinations.

Visit ShareX Read more

Stars
38,071
Forks
3,788
Last commit
1 day ago
Repository age
13 years
License
GPL-3.0

Activity score

96/100

View Repository

Detailed Comparison

Both Cap and ShareX have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

ShareX wins

Community & Popularity

ShareX leads in popularity with 38,071 stars vs 19,562 stars for Cap. The 95% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, ShareX has 3,788 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Cap last updated 6 hours ago and ShareX 1 day ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Cap uses JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js, Rust, Tauri while ShareX leverages C#.

ShareX wins

Project Maturity

ShareX has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Cap which began 3 years ago. This 10.3-year head start suggests ShareX may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable

Licensing

The projects use different licenses: Cap is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while ShareX uses GPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Screen Recording. However, they also have distinct specializations: ShareX extends into Screenshot Utilities.

Cap wins

Hosting & Deployment

Cap provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while ShareX may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.

Other tool comparisons to consider