Learn how Cap and Screenity differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these screen recording tools is best for you.

Both Cap and Screenity have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Cap having 20,670 stars and Screenity having 18,480 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Cap has 1,765 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Cap is growing faster, adding 541 stars in the last 30 days (+2.7%) against adding 75 stars for Screenity (+0.4%). Cap is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Cap last updated 17 hours ago and Screenity 5 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Cap uses Bash, Next.js, Rust, Tauri while Screenity leverages SCSS.
Screenity has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Cap which began 3 years ago. This 3.1-year head start suggests Screenity may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Cap is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while Screenity uses GPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Screen Recording. However, they also have distinct specializations: Screenity extends into Browser Extensions.
Cap provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Screenity may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.

vs
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository