Learn how Cap and Screenity differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these screen recording tools is best for you.
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Both Cap and Screenity have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Cap having 20,284 stars and Screenity having 18,430 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Cap has 1,707 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Cap last updated 1 day ago and Screenity 2 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Cap uses Bash, Next.js, Rust, Tauri while Screenity leverages SCSS.
Screenity has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Cap which began 3 years ago. This 3.1-year head start suggests Screenity may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Cap is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while Screenity uses GPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Screen Recording. However, they also have distinct specializations: Screenity extends into Browser Extensions.
Cap provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Screenity may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.