Learn how Cap and Snapify differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these screen recording tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
3 yearsVersion
v0.6.2License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
capsoftware/cap
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 years agoRepository age
4 yearsLicense
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
marconlp/snapify
Cap appears to have several advantages over Snapify, particularly in popularity, growth and activity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Cap significantly outpaces Snapify in community adoption with 24,216 stars compared to 1,016 stars on GitHub. This 23.8x difference suggests Cap has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Cap has 2,222 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Cap is growing faster, adding 1,208 stars in the last 30 days (+5.3%) against losing 2 stars for Snapify (-0.2%). Cap is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Cap shows more recent development activity with its last commit 1 day ago, while Snapify was last updated 2 years ago. This suggests Cap is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Next.js. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Cap uses Bash, Rust, Tauri.
Both projects started around the same time, with Cap beginning 3 years ago and Snapify 4 years ago.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Screen Recording.
Both Cap and Snapify offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.