Learn how Screenity and ShareX differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these screen recording tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

ShareX appears to have several advantages over Screenity, particularly in popularity, growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
ShareX leads in popularity with 39,200 stars vs 18,488 stars for Screenity. The 112% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, ShareX has 3,899 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
ShareX is growing faster, adding 476 stars in the last 30 days (+1.2%) against adding 62 stars for Screenity (+0.3%). ShareX is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Screenity last updated 1 day ago and ShareX 2 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Screenity uses JavaScript, Typescript, JSX, SCSS while ShareX leverages C#.
ShareX has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Screenity which began 6 years ago. This 7.2-year head start suggests ShareX may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the GPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Screen Recording. However, they also have distinct specializations: Screenity also focuses on Browser Extensions while ShareX extends into Screenshot Utilities.