Learn how Kap and ShareX differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these screen recording tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Warning: This project hasn't been updated in 1 year and might not be actively maintained anymore.
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

ShareX appears to have several advantages over Kap, particularly in popularity, activity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
ShareX leads in popularity with 36,183 stars vs 19,191 stars for Kap. The 89% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, ShareX has 3,643 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
ShareX shows more recent development activity with its last commit 12 hours ago, while Kap was last updated 1 year ago. This suggests ShareX is being more actively maintained.
Kap uses JavaScript, Typescript, JSX, Next.js while ShareX leverages CSS, C#.
ShareX has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Kap which began 10 years ago. This 2.9-year head start suggests ShareX may have more mature features and established processes.
Kap uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than ShareX's GPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Screen Recording. However, they also have distinct specializations: ShareX extends into Screenshot Utilities.