Kap vs ShareX
Learn how Kap and ShareX differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these screen recording tools is best for you.
Learn how Kap and ShareX differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these screen recording tools is best for you.
Kap
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 years agoRepository age
10 yearsVersion
v3.6.0License
MITRepository
wulkano/kap
ShareX
Last 30 days
Last commit
9 hours agoRepository age
13 yearsVersion
v22.4.0License
GPL-3.0Repository
sharex/sharex
Detailed Comparison
ShareX appears to have several advantages over Kap, particularly in popularity, growth, activity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
ShareX appears to have several advantages over Kap, particularly in popularity, growth, activity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
ShareX leads in popularity with 40,797 stars vs 19,416 stars for Kap. The 110% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, ShareX has 4,045 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Growth Momentum
ShareX is growing faster, adding 837 stars in the last 30 days (+2.1%) against adding 27 stars for Kap (+0.1%). ShareX is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Development Activity
ShareX shows more recent development activity with its last commit 9 hours ago, while Kap was last updated 2 years ago. This suggests ShareX is being more actively maintained.
Technology Stack
Kap uses JavaScript, Typescript, JSX, Next.js while ShareX leverages CSS, C#.
Project Maturity
ShareX has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Kap which began 10 years ago. This 2.9-year head start suggests ShareX may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
Kap uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than ShareX's GPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in Screen Recording. However, they also have distinct specializations: ShareX extends into Screenshot Utilities.
Openlane – Open-source, developer-first platform for automated compliance, risk management, and built-in Trust Center.